Author Topic: Friends with Benefits (2011)  (Read 994 times)

samuelrichardscott

  • Guest
Friends with Benefits (2011)
« on: March 16, 2011, 08:53:00 PM »
Previously called Fuckbuddies and No Strings Attached, this is Will Glick's new movie (he wrote and directed Easy A).


An awesome cast. Emma Stone, Mila Kunis, Woody Harrelson and Justin Timberlake (who has surprised me as IMO a credible actor). Can't wait for this one as I loved Easy A and hope this is just as good.

Najemikon

  • Guest
Re: Friends with Benefits (2011)
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2011, 09:26:46 PM »
Interesting this coming out on the heels of the Ashton Kutcher Natalie Portman No Strings Attached...

samuelrichardscott

  • Guest
Re: Friends with Benefits (2011)
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2011, 09:28:09 PM »
and I would guess Hall Pass also has similarities...

Offline goodguy

  • Heavy Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1464
  • Colleen West never liked the first light of day.
    • View Profile
Re: Friends with Benefits (2011)
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2011, 05:53:46 AM »
That looks more than a bit stupid, but Will Gluck + Emma Stone deserve the benefit of the doubt after Easy A. There's also a red band trailer, although only for language, not nudity. Then again, Emma Stone's voice alone should require an NC17 rating.  :)

EDIT:
On a side note: Do we really need a separate thread for each of these upcoming movies, some as far away as 2014? We do have the "must see movies" thread for trailers and stuff. Just asking, I don't want to dictate anything. And if others are fine with it I will be too.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2011, 06:01:17 AM by goodguy »
Matthias

samuelrichardscott

  • Guest
Re: Friends with Benefits (2011)
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2011, 12:07:12 PM »
EDIT:
On a side note: Do we really need a separate thread for each of these upcoming movies, some as far away as 2014? We do have the "must see movies" thread for trailers and stuff. Just asking, I don't want to dictate anything. And if others are fine with it I will be too.

For me I don't see why not? It makes it easier for people to flick through than long threads for points of interest. If there isn't something that interests you, don't open the thread. If I go into a long, more widely covering thread, I'm not sure what it's covering so open it up and 50% of the time hit back when I realise it's not something I'm interested in. It's not like it's a particularly busy forum anyway, and in my experience, it is how most movie forums work.         Of course, as news is released, new threads don't need to be started, as existing ones are there and easy to find ;)