Yet when directors like Scorcese and Eastwood win those Oscars they manage to stay grounded, then go out and do it again.
I too liked this movie and have trouble understanding why others don't.
Quote from: KinkyCyborg on November 01, 2010, 10:39:15 PM Yet when directors like Scorcese and Eastwood win those Oscars they manage to stay grounded, then go out and do it again. I don't know if you can quantify Scorcese with Eastwood in terms of post-Oscar success. Eastwood has released Mystic River, Million Dollar Baby and Letters from Iwo Jima since his first win. While Scorcese has really only released Shutter Island, which, from the reviews I've read, wasn't that good.
Only one win for Scorcese but he's been a bride's maid many times, with some movies that could be argued as the more deserving winner. He's been right there for Goodfellas, The Aviator, Last Temptation Of Christ, Raging Bull and Gangs Of New York.
That many Oscar noms in the Best Picture & Director category would be considered largely successful in most circles as well, despite the lack of wins.
Rating:
I'd agree with you on The Aviator... so much focus was put on emulating the look and feel of that era that the story often went off on wild tangents that were mostly unnecessary.
Quote from: KinkyCyborg on November 02, 2010, 01:03:29 AM Rating: It's a shame that the Hays code was in effect when this was made. It would have been interesting to see how Ford would have dealt with the scene in the book where Rose of Sharon feeds the starving farmer with her breast milk. That was one of the most poignant moments in the story.
Even the mere suggestion of such a thing on film in those days would have never seen the light of day. Remember when Archie Bunker did the diaper change on All In The Family and they showed the naked baby? There was such a stink over that... Still, I too would be interested too see what Ford would have done for that particular scene.
Quote from: KinkyCyborg on November 02, 2010, 01:18:01 AMI'd agree with you on The Aviator... so much focus was put on emulating the look and feel of that era that the story often went off on wild tangents that were mostly unnecessary. Not only tangents, but historical inaccuracies. He's building the Spruce Goose and the XF-11 at the time he's dating Faith Domergue and Ava Gardner. In the film, Domergue tells him that she's 15 years old. But Domergue was born in 1924, making the year 1939 when she meets Hughes. Three years before either plane was commissioned for development by the U.S. government. Ava Gardner was an unknown uncredited actress in 1942, and would not find fame until 1946 in The Killers. If you're going to make an historical biopic, you should do a little fact checking.
I hadn't thought about this movie in a long time. Thank you for the review Kevin.I really like William H. Macy. Have you ever seen him in Door to Door?