Apparently there is talk of DC rebooting Batman and there is this link that someone sent me.
Well done on keeping the review spoiler free
Just came back from watching it myself. Two Three minor and one less minor quibble:Unless there were projection issues in my IMAX it seems he used an actual IMAX camera again in several scenes. However, if I am right, I could not figure out th motivation for th use of the larger framing and worse it seemed rather random.typical timer problem. (click to show/hide)the timer seemed to jump from 10 to 5 minutes within 2, but then need another 10 to reach 0 EDIT: I wonder if Catwoman will run away as she said or turn around... Oh, what a surprise... Considering it is supposed to be a Batman movie, there could have been more of the caped crusader for my taste.
But I totally agree otherwise. Great, great movie, more of the level of a police drama than an action movie though. The scene with Alfred is incredibly awesome and shows just how brilliant Michael Caine is; note ow emotional it is despite the lack of music!
Acting is very good across the board, from Gary Oldman over Joseph Gordon-Levitt to Michael Caine. Many bit parts were cast with fairly famous actors as well (who was that cop on the bridge...?). Tom Hardy did really well despite half his face covered by his mask (and he was much better understandable than the trailer made us think).
And then of course the ending, rounding off this trilogy very well.
I prefer The Dark Knight over this one, but this is still high class cinema and a must-see.
(click to show/hide)Unless there is plans I felt introducing Robin at the end was a bit of a waste.Comic book readers supposedly could see a twist coming, knowing that Raz Al'Ghul's child is a girl?Having the Scarecrow have another cameo was a cool idea.I was stupid enough to think The Batman may have sacrificed himself, feeling all sad or a minute or two. I felt stupid when the reveal was bing prepared (auto-pilot had been fixed)
Quote from: dfmorgan on July 25, 2012, 08:16:19 PMApparently there is talk of DC rebooting Batman and there is this link that someone sent me.Or today's strip.
Do you mean the last scene with Alfred? That one was incredibly emotional - it had me start to tear up. His earlier scenes are good too..with how he is confronting Bruce about him not moving on..and that one conversation that goes back to events in the last movie. Man that was rough.
I don't know which one I prefer honestly.
(click to show/hide)I've seen that some people have been debating about the ending, with some claiming it was a dream. This was not Inception..and (click to show/hide)Nolan has never done a dream in place of reality in the first two Batman movies...I doubt he would have started with this one.
Well, one of the strips says Bane's mask is not explained. I'd have to disagree, I thought that was sufficiently covered (not in all glorious detail, but that isn't needed).
I was mainly going by the fact that the previous one had more high octane action... I guess in overall he was simply taking a slightly different approach, rather than just repeating what he had done before. All three parts have stylistic differences...
Yes they do..and I think that is part of what makes them all so good. They are all wonderful movies in their own rights..but put them together and they make a hell of a good trilogy. One of the best ever...I'd say right up there with Lord of the Rings. Yes I just went there.
(click to show/hide)It has been said that Batman is a symbol and the man in the costume doesn't matter..that is said a few times in this movie. Bruce even talks about it being a symbol in the first movie. He has seen something in John that makes him believe that John can step up if Batman is needed again.
I am right there with you! LOTR or Toy Story...
(click to show/hide)Yes, Batman merely being a symbol is very much a theme. Just to be sure he repeats it one more time at the end t Gordon, just before he basically reveals himself to him and flys off. We even do see this acted upon at the end! John gets the key to the batcave and we can assume that he will continue to give Gotham the Batman they need. Or a Robin or Nightwing or someone... So, Bruce Wayne may have left Gtoham, but he made sure the symbol would remain.
(click to show/hide)Lucius finds out that the auto pilot had been fixed and Gordon goes up on that roof and sees that the Bat signal has been repaired.
So many little things go back to the first movie...bringing things full circle.[/spoiler]
(click to show/hide)That was one hint I missed, and mauve it's the most obvious one I saw Gordon earlier at the broken bat signal and I saw him at the fixed one, but it idn't really click at the time that it "must have been repaired"
So many little things go back to the first movie...bringing things full circle.I think I need to see the first one again soon...
Can't wait to have it watched by tomorrow night and discussing with you.
I got to see this at the weekend, and thought it was an excellent film. Not as good as The Dark Knight, but still excellent.However I've got a couple of niggles about the ending and wanted to share them in case I missed something: (click to show/hide)When he goes to drag the bomb over the bay, he says to Gordon and Catwoman that the auto-pilot doesn't work (I don't remember anyone else there). But he later fixes the bat signal, letting Gordon know he's alive and Catwoman is sitting with him in Florence. So why would he lie and let them think (temporarily) he was dead?Slightly later, he's still in the plane when you see him pull it up and shoot the building to get over it. At that point the children on the bus watch the plane all the way out to sea, until it explodes. At what point do you think he bailed out?Lastly, Alfred is devastated at the funeral, but in Florence reacts as if he was expecting to see him at the table. Did he know he was alive at the funeral? Is he really that good an actor (Alfred, not Michael Caine)?What do you guys think? These are very minor niggles and I did love the film.
(click to show/hide)I certainly never expected Talia, despite knowing fine well Ra's had a daughter in the comics, Nolan certainly deftly misdirected me on that note.