While I remember that Cobb described the reasoning behind him not being the architect like that, I thought he also mentioned that the dream is populated by the dreamer's subconscious. They also described twice (once Cobb, once Arthur) how the population created by the dreamer can turn on "aliens" in the dream, just like they attacked Ariadne during her first session. maybe it's because Cobb has done this so much, that his subconscious is able to add population to other people's dream...?
No matter what dream level, you need a kick to wake up "early", which can be provided in the dream through death or falling from heights or a physical shock OR it can be provided outside the dream (bathtub drop). I believe this works for dream and dream-in-dream. However, since for the main job they needed three levels, they needed stringer drugs, which in turn would making it impossible to wake up to reality from any kick. It still works to use a kick from one level to the next.
The limbo part now clearly needs another viewing from me. I thought only dying will do it, but you are right, the place where Fischer was (where they meet Mal), is obviously supposed to be limbo. Oh, yes, now I remember though. That level was limbo already and he had left shortly when the kick happened, which made him wake up in the truck just to drown shortly after.So before, Mal and Cobb where in a level (maybe 3), where they grew old, died and therefore went to limbo? That brings me back to the question why they didn't wake up, as they didn't use drugs as strong.
Not sure why it confused you, it makes good sense to me.
Isn't the scene in the beginning cut that so that it appears to be part of the actual opening dream, where they try to retrieve Saito's secret as a test?The bold part is what I meant. Without showing reality in between we move from the scene that is repeated at the end of the movie right into the dream that represents the test for Saito. So, upon first viewing we may think that t's all part of the same dream, only at the end do we realize where the split was.
I think that's the key point. If the architect can imitate your totem he can make you believe you are in reality, which is to be avoided at all cost!
So, yes, if only you know your totem, what it feels like and how it behaves, then you can make sure you're in reality. The point is the reverse, coming from the angle that it's not your dream! If it is not your dream, then your totem will be missing or it will feel/behave differently, hence you are in a dream. The totem is less important in a dream created by yourself. I think this is called a false positive or such? Having the totem be o.k. will not show you whether your dreaming or awake, as it might be your own dream. However, if the totem is not o.k., that's when it's telling you something.
Darn, Mark Kermode pointed it out in his review, but next time I watch I also must pay attention again in whose dream they are at what point.
Yes, I think that's what he meant. It was probably just a very efficient dialog piece.
First things first, 'scuse the French, but... this film is fucking awesome!
You mentioned that it was strange he shared it. Demonstrating it is fine, but letting someone else touch it diffuses it. I'm wondering...
Quote from: Jonb) What is the significance of Mal locking her totem away in their world?I thought she did that as a way of blocking out the truth from herself that they were in a dream. When Cobb is telling Adriane about what happened, he mentions how Mal had locked something away, deep inside. It had already been set up in the movie that people would frequently have important stuff locked in a safe in a dream.I am wondering something now because I can't remember for sure. Was the totem really in the safe, or did Cobb put it there? Was it actually shown laying in the safe before he started it spinning?
b) What is the significance of Mal locking her totem away in their world?
Quote from: Jond) and while on the subject of totems, is there a clue to Adriane's choice of a chess piece?I'm thinking it probably is a clue to something. Like she is the chess master or something. Arthur knows that Cobb is having issues with Mal showing up in the dreams, but he really doesn't push it too much. Adriane does. She keeps pushing Cobb to talk about Mal and what happened. Then Adriane starts prodding him to confront her in a dream. Adriane's actions in regard to those things does support the idea of an inception actually being done on Cobb, with Adriane being the one to plant the idea. If that is the case, I could see Miles being behind it. When they meet and Cobb talks about the job, Miles tells him to come back to reality. I think Miles was concerned about Cobb and the issues he was having regarding Mal. From what Cobb said, Miles taught him how to do the dream sharing stuff, so Miles could possible pull that off.
d) and while on the subject of totems, is there a clue to Adriane's choice of a chess piece?
Then there is also Adriane's name itself possibly being another clue. I can't remember exactly now, but Adriane is the name of the goddess of the maze or something like that I think. Or someone named Adriane led one of the gods out of a maze. I need to look it up again. The first time she and Cobb meet, he has her draw mazes as a test. The levels of the dream are described as mazes at least once. That could work with the theory that the inception is being done on Cobb as well. Though if it was, I wonder was anything shown reality? And if it was, why would Saito go along with the plan? Hmmmm.
Mal is invading the dreams to persuade Cobb to leave: I don't think this is really Mal. I think it is a projection. He said himself to her at the end, "you are not my wife" and that's important. It's the theory of Uncanny Valley again! You know deep down when something isn't right and he knows this isn't Mal. Plus he also said, you have no control over your sub-concious. I think that is very important. His sub-concious is manifesting the "seed of an idea" rattling around in Cobb's mind; the idea being Mal's inception that it is all a dream. The best way for that seed to grow naturally is have it represented by Mal screwing with his plans because that is the psychological idea of transferring guilt and sub-consciously you self-sabotage. You want something to happen, but you can't let it happen, so project the will to do that thing onto someone else. "Oh no! Look what Mal did! Ah, well... tut."
Now, I want to add my own idea into this mix... Saito. I'm wondering if there is more to him, though it may undermine the "it was all a dream!" ending...
Is Saito manipulating Cobb from the beginning? Consider the first Architect, the one who gets the rug wrong. Saito is ruthless in leaving him to be dealt with and I was having a problem with the film seemingly setting up Saito as a bastard and then softening him into a team member. But the more I thought about it, the more I think he is playing a part to gain Cobb's trust, if you believe Saito is in Cobb's dream.
Very good question. I have wondered a bit about Saito too. That's true with the first architect..and with all the preparation and planning that they put into the jobs, it seems like that shouldn't have been missed. And how Saito already knew so much about what was going on during both of those dreams. Saito is very questionable and there isn't enough shared about him. Though the same thing can be said for most of the characters.
Quote from: JonConsider that we didn't see the dream set-up on the train. To paraphrase the film, "can he remember how he got there?". Could the team -including Saito- have ambushed Cobb, rather than the other way around?Very good point. We have no idea how they got there, so it does raise the question..does Cobb know? Very interesting idea. So...if we go with that theory, why do you think the team ambushed Cobb? Do get him to let go of the guilt associated with Mal's death? To get him out of a dream he's stuck in? Some other reason?
Consider that we didn't see the dream set-up on the train. To paraphrase the film, "can he remember how he got there?". Could the team -including Saito- have ambushed Cobb, rather than the other way around?
Quote from: JonIs Cobb dreaming the whole thing or is he part of someone elses from the start? Mal or Saito, maybe...Remember the idea that you train your sub-concious to fight for you and it manifests the thugs? Were the gunmen in Mogadishu really from that company, or... I'll leave it there![...]Ohhh..that reminds me. One thing I read the other night suggested that when Cobb is running through Mogadishu that he is in a dream then. The person who made that suggestion pointed out how so many thugs are chasing him and also how that alley or whatever gets so narrow and he seems stuck, but then he just gets out just in time.
Is Cobb dreaming the whole thing or is he part of someone elses from the start? Mal or Saito, maybe...Remember the idea that you train your sub-concious to fight for you and it manifests the thugs? Were the gunmen in Mogadishu really from that company, or... I'll leave it there!
I missed Jon's post and Marie's response! I'll rectify that now. I won't repeat things Marie already commented, I'll simply state my agreement now.
I think the ideal totem is a complete secret. If you show it to someone, it's already halfway compromised. Arthur explains that to Adriane, I think, when she shows him her chess piece.
While it may be shown ambiguously on purpose, I seem to remember him saying that she locked it away for the reasons you said. At first he just knew there was a secret in the safe and then he was shocked to find her totem, as it became clear what her intentions were.
Hmmm, one could say Arthur's dice represents that he is more depending on luck where the day takes him, whereas Adriane's chess piece shows us that she is planning things meticulously? At the same time the latter is a possible hint to her being part of manipulating Cobb. doing an inception on him.Miles could be the orchestrator behind it all, indeed. His motive being that he wants his grandchildren to have a father again, his means that he gets to provide the architect.At this point, I think it's possible that Mal is indeed dead, that part of Cobb's story could be true, and that he only subsequently buried himself in a dreamworld.
A quick google could not reveal anything about a goddess, mazes or any such thing to me.
Cobb wanted a maze, so that if he should project Mal she would not find him too quickly.
Wasn't that what we discussed before, that Cobb is the dreamer, the whole time (meaning no reality was shown at all)? We just haven't conclusively proven it yet.
I think I'm leaning more to Mal being Cobb's projection as well.
No undermining going on really. It is merely a theory that we discuss whether it even is possible.
Interesting idea, but what would be the point? Him being the one orchestrating the inception on Mal? Why? There is two possible and very personal core points to this film:a) Cobb's need to get back to his children.b)someone trying to get Cobb to wake up.These would go along with Nolan's honesty you mentioned. If Saito was such a key player here, none of his motivations could be that personal, could they?
Saito is trained to protect his subconscious. I think it is not much more than a plot point to set up the fact that Fischer is trained as well.
Maybe they ambushed him to have him fail, so that the following setup to do the inception on Fischer would seem more challenging?
I had the same idea about the guys in Mogadishu earlier today, weighing the different ideas we discussed so far. I mean sure, he is a suspected murderer, but would the FBI/CIA really send such a strong army after him who shoots around like that with risking the life of innocent bystanders? It made more sense to me suddenly that they were indeed his own projections.
Bugger... I have to stop thinking about this now...
I think I agree with that..they try to keep it completely secret. Though Ariadne - I think I spelled her name wrong before..oops. Anyway, Ariadne didn't show Arthur her chess piece. He showed her his die and wouldn't let her touch it. After she made the chess piece and was doing something to it so it would fall over, she saw Cobb. She had it in her hand and only sort of showed it to him...and she wouldn't let him touch it.
Quote from: AchimWhile it may be shown ambiguously on purpose, I seem to remember him saying that she locked it away for the reasons you said. At first he just knew there was a secret in the safe and then he was shocked to find her totem, as it became clear what her intentions were.Her intentions? I thought he already knew at that point that she didn't want to leave limbo. Which is why he went to plant the idea.
I spelled her name wrong before. Sorry about that.Ariadne.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariadne#Ariadne_as_a_goddess_figureGo down to the section on Ariadne as a goddess figure. In that section, she is called mistress of the labyrinth, and a labyrinth is a maze.And in one book I read, there is something about using her string to find the way out of a labyrinth..so that is what I was thinking. So maybe it is a hint that she is leading Cobb back to reality. Or maybe I'm over thinking.
Quote from: AchimSaito is trained to protect his subconscious. I think it is not much more than a plot point to set up the fact that Fischer is trained as well.Was it said for sure that he'd been trained for that? If he had been, wouldn't his projections have started going after Arthur and Cobb right away, sort like what happened with Fisher? I was thinking that maybe Saito had just heard about stealing from dreams being possible. Though I'm honestly not sure.
Quote from: AchimMaybe they ambushed him to have him fail, so that the following setup to do the inception on Fischer would seem more challenging?Ok. Though why would they want the job with Fisher to be more challenging? To seem more believable to Cobb?
I thought they were just goons from the company that was supposed to have hired Cobb and Arthur to steal ..whatever from Saito to begin with. When they go to leave, Cobb says that the company - he mentions a name, but I can't remember it now - that they will know the job failed. And I think when he first meets with Eames, Cobbs mentions something about the company being after him. And if it is just the company that is trying to kill him there, that does seem a bit more far fetched that a company would have hired goons trying to kill someone in broad daylight.
Anyway, the other thing to consider is that if we accept that Cobb is not dreaming at the start, he could still be dreaming at the end. ARGH! But that would undermine his wish to see his children and not give his character proper closure. Bugger... I have to stop thinking about this now...
We have a man grieving so much for his dead wife, he can't let go of her. He holds himself responsible and this guilt is stopping him moving on. He can't do his job properly and he has essentially become something he never would have while she was alive: a thief. He's only a thief so he has an excuse to stay on the run and not face up to the truth. It's his crutch, and his selfish attitude is making him keep away from his kids. He thinks he has to, but he just needs a push in the right direction. Face up to her memory, accept the truth and look to the future.His father-in-law can see this situation and is trying to get through to him. Via him the man is introduced to a young girl, an unknown quantity even to herself probably, a stranger who can take a critical look and guide him through his memories. In another film, she might be another love interest actually.Inception just embodies this with a dream, so we can actually see Cobb's perception of his wife. We see him literally succeed and come to terms with her memory. He accepts that his memory of her is only half of who she really was and he has to let go, otherwise she'll actually become a corrupt memory. He actually says a great line, something about accepting her faults. Remembering why she wasn't perfect. That is exactly what you have to do to overcome grief. Coming full circle, what is his totem, really? It's an object belonging to his wife and the metaphor is clear: he cannot let go of it. There he is trying to come to terms with her memory, while at the same time, he literally won't let go for fear of losing his mind.In another story, the object could be anything and destroying it is the step forward. I now think the shot of it spinning at the end is simply that he has walked away from it. And what it does or doesn't do is of no consequence. He no longer needs it.
Quote from: DragonfireQuote from: AchimMaybe they ambushed him to have him fail, so that the following setup to do the inception on Fischer would seem more challenging?Ok. Though why would they want the job with Fisher to be more challenging? To seem more believable to Cobb?I didn't mean the job should be more challenging, but it should be an appropriate challenge that Cobb will be intrigued to accept. But hey. I was just going with the theory Jon had thrown out. maybe he'll address it.
I did mean to apologise in case I was repeating anything from earlier. It's so easy to get bogged down in details you forget, just why did Nolan make this film? It's themes are the same as Memento, Prestige and the Batman movies. A process of dealing with grief and identity.
Ok, I'm starting to have a problem with Cobb actually being in a dream from the start. Let's rewind a little...If that's true, it entirely undermines the Fischer storyline and makes a mockery of his moment at his father's death bed. That is such an elegant and clever set-up that to diffuse it is a bit cheap. This is what I meant earlier about Nolan and his honesty. I don't think he would do all that just for sleight of hand. You have to consider the emotional focus of a narrative and in that scene in the vault, we are right with Fischer.
Now if Cobb isn't dreaming at the start, it in no way writes off any of the other intrigue you have discussed, in fact it fits in even neater that Caine (can't remember character name) could be more important than we think. His comment, "come back to reality", contriving Ariadne's (I was getting her name wrong too!) involvement and her similarity to mythology may be synonyms for us, the audience, to help us understand their involvement, but not an explicit reference to what they are doing. Typical narrative structure to strengthen the idea, but not actually be part of it if you see what I mean.Probably not!
Anyway, the other thing to consider is that if we accept that Cobb is not dreaming at the start, he could still be dreaming at the end.
ARGH! But that would undermine his wish to see his children and not give his character proper closure. Bugger... I have to stop thinking about this now...
Yeah. Like that was going to happen.
Actually, by concentrating on the film itself, I've come to a conclusion. Cobb is likely not dreaming. Just consider what the film is actually about.We have a man grieving so much for his dead wife, he can't let go of her. He holds himself responsible and this guilt is stopping him moving on. He can't do his job properly and he has essentially become something he never would have while she was alive: a thief. He's only a thief so he has an excuse to stay on the run and not face up to the truth. It's his crutch, and his selfish attitude is making him keep away from his kids. He thinks he has to, but he just needs a push in the right direction. Face up to her memory, accept the truth and look to the future.
His father-in-law can see this situation and is trying to get through to him. Via him the man is introduced to a young girl, an unknown quantity even to herself probably, a stranger who can take a critical look and guide him through his memories. In another film, she might be another love interest actually.
Inception just embodies this with a dream, so we can actually see Cobb's perception of his wife. We see him literally succeed and come to terms with her memory. He accepts that his memory of her is only half of who she really was and he has to let go, otherwise she'll actually become a corrupt memory. He actually says a great line, something about accepting her faults. Remembering why she wasn't perfect. That is exactly what you have to do to overcome grief. Coming full circle, what is his totem, really? It's an object belonging to his wife and the metaphor is clear: he cannot let go of it. There he is trying to come to terms with her memory, while at the same time, he literally won't let go for fear of losing his mind.In another story, the object could be anything and destroying it is the step forward. I now think the shot of it spinning at the end is simply that he has walked away from it. And what it does or doesn't do is of no consequence. He no longer needs it.
Actually, I reviewed The Road the other day and that has a very similar situation.And back to him being on the run and creating an excuse for himself? They used the same thing in Bones of all things! Her dad is on the run and telling Bones and her brother, that he has to stay away. It's better for everyone. She begs him and says it is not better. Eventually he gives himself up, Booth arrests him, but eventually, he is free. So he has earned his reward by doing something tougher than staying on the run.
First sign that I am loosing grip in the details. (I have a bad memory and was quite happz I made it this far )
I originally had the name from IMDb (couldn't remember any of them) and then subsequently followed your spelling, since you seemed to remember them better. We know IMDb can easily be wrong.Since we prefer the other theory, let's just say they gave her an appropriate name matching her abilities...
Actually, no, he wasn't trained per se, or just a little bit. He did not recognize that he is in a dreamworld until the carpet incident...
I didn't mean the job should be more challenging, but it should be an appropriate challenge that Cobb will be intrigued to accept. But hey. I was just going with the theory Jon had thrown out. maybe he'll address it.
That makes sense! I just went with FBI/CIA since he talked about the problem why he can't go back (police thinking he killed Mal). hence I connected the killer team with that.
Marie (I am fairly certain) and me are totally with you on this. I think Critter mentioned the theory that the whole thing may have been a dream, which she had read somewhere; she didn't entirely agree either, I think. My personal ideal would be, that the beginning is not a dream and yes, the end shouldn't be a dream either. His totem somewhat confirms that, yet the age of the children still has me baffled.