(click to show/hide)So you're in that camp, are you. Then again, I guess you're not, because most people who don't like Jack say that they hate the ending. You seem to at least appreciate the fact how they ended the story; it was inevitable, really.
(click to show/hide)I wouldn't say I'm in that camp. The ending works for the story, it really does and there's no other possibility. I just find it really frustrating that after spending 60+ hours with John, they kill him off and then force me to play as Jack. Even let me continue playing as Jack.They shouldn't have given you control of Jack - or maybe just until you get your revenge. Not after. The game should've ended when John dies with long cutscene of Jack seeking revenge (I could even stomach a last dead eye moment during the final duel) but don't give me control of Jack. I'm John. End of story.
(click to show/hide)Now, what to do?
Quote from: Achim on June 21, 2010, 02:42:25 PM (click to show/hide)Now, what to do?A similar situation happens at the end of Dragon Age: Origins.This is going to spoil Dragon Age: OriginsIf you plan on playing that game STOP READING. (click to show/hide)At the end of Dragon Age: Origins, you have a choice to sacrifice yourself, or have one of your followers sacrifice themselves. Then the story end and you leave the game world to become the leader of the Gray Wardens. Either way, you wouldn't be able to still roam the world and make sense in regards to the game's story.What they do is send you back in time to a point before the final mission, and let you keep playing with your whole team intact. That way, you can still do the side missions and hunt for achievements. The game's story even mentions it to the effect that you are in an "alternate" past and the dragon overlord has been slain and such.It is a bit jarring, but it at least lets you keep playing as the character you've grown to love during the course of the game.I much prefer that, to being force to continue as Jack as in Red Dead.
(click to show/hide)I understand and agree that playing onwards with jack is somewhat anticlimactic. But, to be fair, introducing time travel into the world of RDR would be a little strange. of course, if a DeLorean came by and brought John back to the future from before the game ends
(click to show/hide)No, no, no, no! You misunderstand me. Dragon Age doesn't introduce time travel. You don't actually travel back in time - it just sets the time back and lets you carry on doing the little side quests and achievement hunting. The character doesn't actually time travel.They make it clear that it is NOT part of the story, and just a way to let you do the side quests you might have ignored along the way.
Are you doing any online?
I wonder if Sony will eventually make online play as part of PSN+ .. that would probably kill them in a sense - because it's hard to convince people to start paying for something that was free .. but then, people on Xbox are happily p(l)aying and it's a gold mine.. wonder if Sony will resist!