Citizen Kane (1941)But it doesn't have a soul. And frankly, aside from Welles himself, the acting is less than stellar. And frankly, aside from Welles himself, the acting is less than stellar.
Eagle Eye (2008)God, what a boring piece of crap. A pedestrian and far too long setup recycles the oldest clichés available to introduce the characters. When the action finally kicks in, it pretty much moves without pause - and without a single moment of excitement. Then the movie again grinds to a halt for the proper patriotic wrap-up (with medals and all, seriously) and if this wasn't enough, a romantic coda gets tacked on.If you thought Monaghan was wasted in MI3, here she is even more so. And LaBeouf? Well, the only other movie I've seen him in was the first Transformers. There he was quite good - as a teenager. I'm not sure if he can pull off an adult action hero yet, even in a better movie. Judging him by this one would be unfair.
Quote from: goodguy on December 01, 2009, 03:53:44 PMCitizen Kane (1941)because it does have a soul...
Citizen Kane (1941)
I thought the acting was typical of its time, but surely you aren't including Joseph Cotten or Dorothy Comingore?
Quote from: goodguy on December 01, 2009, 02:50:05 PMEagle Eye (2008)Well, I was surprised when you picked it! I gave it a good review because I liked the overall plot but recognised it was otherwise pap. I did like the action though and that was my main reason for watching. Looking forward to seeing it again actually. Would Indiana Jones be your thing? Just thinking LaBeouf has more to do in that, though I won't go so far as to say he was particularly better and the film overall has some awful flaws.
Eagle Eye (2008)
By the way, I have a feeling Lakeview Terrace might be up your street. No, I don't mean on a map...